Polyamory

27 August 2017

What is it like to be in love with more than one person at a time? Is monogamy natural, as authors likeHelen Fisherhave argued, or an outmoded cultural artifact, as claimed by authors likeChristopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá? On this week's philosophy talk, we discuss polyamory with writer and philosophy professor Carrie Jenkins.

在我看来,试图确定某件事是由于自然因素还是文化因素是徒劳的;当然,任何像建立一段浪漫关系这样复杂的人类努力都有自然和文化的成分。理解多角恋的一个更好的方法是批判性地看待一夫一妻制的默认假设。

Although lifelong fidelity to a single partner remains a cultural ideal, few people live up to it; for example, one in five Americans surveyed ina 2015 YouGov poll承认对伴侣不忠。即使抛开不正当的风流韵事不谈,有些人自称一夫一妻制的唯一方法就是拥有一系列的伴侣,一个接一个。

Furthermore,there is widespread disagreement about what the rules of monogamy require. Is it cheating to send flirty text messages to someone other than your partner? What about kissing, going to a strip club, or reaching out to an ex on Facebook? And what about deep emotional connections that don't include physical sexual activity?

Author Amy Gahran sees monogamy as part of a larger set of unspoken expectations that she calls theRelationship Escalator:在一段早期的求爱期之后,你和你的伴侣将自己定义为一对,在性和浪漫上彼此排斥,承诺成为对方的首要任务,合并家庭和财务,结婚,生孩子,直到死亡将你们分开。虽然符合这一模式的关系可能是美好的,但不检查其基本假设也会导致许多不必要的痛苦。如果你决定有两个伴侣或没有伴侣会让你最幸福,会发生什么?你需要的引导是自动扶梯无法提供的。

Polyamory is not a panacea. Having multiple partners is not enough to destroy sexism and heteronormativity, as even a cursory glance polygynous cult leaders will show.Intimate partner abusehappens in polyamorous relationships, as well as monogamous ones, and polyamorists can easilyrecapitulate existing social hierarchies. Some pathologies are specific to polyamory, such as the tendency of someunicorn hunters, or couples who seek out a third party to join in their sexual adventures, to treat their additional partner as disposable.

幸运的是,互联网上有很多有用的信息和指导。More Than Twooffers advice on topics like communication, jealousy, and time management, as well as arelationship bill of rights.Poly Role Models提供有用的案例研究的多样化纲要,每周更新。The YouTube seriesCompersionis mostly a what-not-to-do manual, but it lets you learn from others' mistakes, and makes for entertaining TV. Podcasts likePolyamory Weeklydiscuss real-world problems from a polyamorous perspective.

Relationships are tricky, and monogamy and polyamory both present distinctive challenges. With any style of relationship, communication and critical reflection are key; the unexamined love life is not worth love-living! I'm looking forward to more critical conversations with Carrie and Ken, and hopefully with you, this week when we discuss polyamory.

Comments(5)


Larkrising's picture

Larkrising

Thursday, August 31, 2017 -- 9:53 PM

The person who commented that

The person who commented that security in a mate produces better childbirth outcomes implied that marriage means more security in a mate, which is not necessarily true

Tim Smith's picture

Tim Smith

Sunday, December 22, 2019 -- 10:20 PM

I don't think we got any more

I don't think we got any more critical than your blog post Ray. Polyamory is still on tender ground, and perhaps it is best to discuss it without criticism. People have enough to think about than what others choose in life.

I, at least, learned more from your thought than the show for now. I'm intrigued enough to read this book. Thanks for writing this up.

Tim Smith's picture

Tim Smith

Tuesday, December 24, 2019 -- 11:37 AM

So... I took the time to read

So... I took the time to read Carrie's book - What Love Is. I am changed, but not as much or even as Professor Jenkins would have me.

这本书里讲的远不止多角恋。在实践、伦理和元伦理的争论中,范围是广泛的。我们生活在一个科学时代,它迫使哲学远离人性问题,甚至道德问题。总的来说,我注意到活着的需要,也让别人活着。两厢情愿的行为是在做这件事的人之间进行的,只要它不限制别人的潜力。

Jenkins gets the science wrong in places and takes argument without foundation. I would have her take this up with Bertrand Russell whom she visits, takes and leaves to get to a "progressive" attitude of polyamory. Polyamory is not progressive as much emblematic of the free thought and economy we live – at the moment. That can change, is changing and I’m not sure where to.

Certainly there is no science to vindicate polyamory as there is for the growing awareness and sensitivity in and around gender studies. Neuroscience is not finding difference nor refuge for having multiple romantic or sexual partners. If there is a rise or fall in polyamory it will play out in social, cultural, mimetic and memetic spheres that transcend biology.

There is nothing wrong or evil in polyamory. That is repulsive. We need to be sensitive to polyamorists lives and choice (I don’t want to get side tracked here on choice and consent – I do not believe in free will and have fundamental issues around this with respect to consent.)

There may be wrong in role modeling polyamory for those who don’t attend to it’s value. This includes family, friends and especially children. I am particularly not changed in my thought around special liberty and protection for children. That current culture should needle it’s monogamy into the Lego of childhood is no call for equal rights in marketing, family structures or legal stricture.

Let’s just get along in the spirit of the season. To that, I can sign my name.

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Saturday, January 4, 2020 -- 11:15 AM

I am pretty much a

当谈到这类事情时,我是一个传统主义者,尽管我屈尊批评一种生活方式,只是因为我不会认同它。不同的社会有不同的社会实践,许多形式的家庭已经被尝试过。不过,在我看来,我们逐渐认识到的传统婚姻,通常适用于西方经济体。例如,如果我们认为儿童可能从公共家庭结构中获益更多;他们会(而且应该)认识到他们个人并不是家庭的中心,这可能是一个有分量的论点:这可能有助于他们自力更生、独立和/或全面适应家庭生活,也可能滋生出一种无道德的人,他们的主要兴趣是照顾自己。在教育孩子自力更生和独立自主之间,有一个微妙的平衡,也有一个让孩子对午餐吃什么无所作为的无助绝望的衣架;人交朋友;谁对他们是好意谁对他们是无可挽回的伤害。关于如何处理残疾人,优生学家有一些可怕的想法和方法。作为一个规范规则,我们现在不认为处置是答案,而更喜欢把这些人视为“能力不同”。 Well, these are only intuition pumps (to mimic Dennett). I have no wish to write an essay about the subject, because it does not hold such an interest for me. Others are better equipped than I. This is, as Smith has intoned, tender ground and bears walking lightly, I think...

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Saturday, February 12, 2022 -- 4:58 PM

There was a blip on a local

There was a blip on a local tekevision network this evening. Almost as if there were some subliminal message about polyamory. But, there was no message, no story, nothing. i found it odd but do not know what it means. You know what I think about this. You should also know I have neither the skill nor inclination to pursue some rampage against it. The matter is simply not important to me. Apparently someone IS worried. I won't speculate.

I've read and agree to abide by the Community Guidelines