Ken and John introduce this special edition of Philosophy Talk: a look back at the philosophical events and ideas that shaped the year. Among the topics that will be discussed are the fraught relations between law enforcement and African Americans, incited in part by the killing of unarmed black people by white police officers and the consequent protests nation-wide. Another focus of the conversation will be the year in neuroscience and the brain, and a third focus will be the nature of free speech on college campuses and the stance and mission of universities in regards to academic freedom.

John and Ken welcome Katherine Franke, Professor of Law at Columbia University and Director of the Center for Gender and Sexuality Law. Ken says that while academic appointments are the result of a long and rigorous process, the University of Illinois dismissed this process and let go of Salaita, whose case is discussed in the Roving Philosophical Report, just because his tweets troubled influential donors. Katherine speaks about the rigorous process that rules appointments and dismissals and believes this process was not followed regarding the case of Salaita. John wonders whether there is any room to ignore the wishes of donors when it comes to appointments when universities live off of these donations. Katherine explains how this relates to the evolution of universities, both public and private, becoming more like corporations and owing more responsibility to donors. Ken speaks about his personal experience at the university and worries about the weight and influence that the funding sector has on this type of decisions. The Salaita case is further discussed, and the question of whether all points of view – controversial and uncomfortable included – should be allowed on university campuses is debated.

The next guest welcomed to the Philosophy Talk stage is Chris Lebron, Professor of Philosophy and African-American Studies at Yale University and author ofThe Color of Our Shame: Race and Justice in Our Time. John first asks Chris whether the events that occurred this year, like those in Ferguson, are potentially as galvanizing in terms of civil rights as was the murder of Emmett Till in 1955. Chris explains that indeed they might be as galvanizing if they were exceptional. But the way stories are picked up and covered nowadays has changed, and technology is allowing for attention to be called these events more frequently, and so the occurrences feel galvanizing. Ken asks what these events teach us about race. Chris explains that while a large proportion of the population feels we are past racial differentiation, that we have moved forward, another part of the population is showing that they think blacks should be the focus of the police. The perception of police and what Chris would change – he would write a radical epistemic ground for our educational system – are discussed.

下一位来到节目的嘉宾是Rudolph Tanzi，他是哈佛大学神经学教授，也是马萨诸塞总医院遗传与衰老研究中心的主任。肯邀请鲁道夫谈谈最近发表在《自然》杂志上的一篇论文，这篇论文是关于在培养皿中利用所谓的微型大脑制造阿尔茨海默病的。肯问鲁道夫，这是否被称为科学哲学的关键实验;鲁道夫解释说，在他所有的实验中，这是最接近的。人类基因组的映射也被讨论，因为是哲学和科学的交叉。

• Roving Philosophical Report(Seek to 2:58): Shuka Kalantari files a report on the growing trend of disinviting college commencement speakers such as Condoleezza Rice at Rutgers and Michael Bloomberg at Harvard. The report also touches on the comments made by Steven Salaita, a tenured professor who was fired after being accused of making anti-Semitic comments.
• Roving Philosophical Report(Seek to 15:55): Shuka Kalantari brings up the names of individuals caught in a confrontation with a police officer and tells their story.
• 60-Second Philosopher(翻到48:26):伊恩·肖尔斯在主流媒体上回忆了这一年，包括什么被排在“最”的名单上。