A World Without Work

Sunday, February 9, 2020
First Aired:
Sunday, September 24, 2017

What Is It

Work: a lot lot of people do it, and a lot of people don’t seem to like it very much. But as computers and artificial intelligence get increasingly sophisticated, more and more of our workers will lose their jobs to technology. Should we view this inevitability with hope or with despair? Without the order and purpose that meaningful work provides in our lives, would we end up bored and restless? What obligations does government have to deal with these changes? What about providing all citizens with a basic income? The Philosophers work hard with Juliana Bidadanure from Stanford University,Faculty Director of theStanford Basic Income Lab.

Listening Notes

黛布拉和肯开始讨论机器人能力的快速增长是值得期待还是值得害怕。机器人会取代我们的工作,把我们从日常的苦工中解放出来吗?或者他们会剥夺我们意义的一个主要来源吗?这些未来到底有多牵强?这仅仅是一个技术进步的问题,还是政治和政府能够切实地规范这些技术的实施?

斯坦福大学教授Juliana Bidadanure加入了节目,并开始谈论她的成长经历是如何让她对就业和收入问题感兴趣的。朱莉安娜对自动化能否取代所有人类劳动表示怀疑。尽管如此,朱莉安娜承认有很大一部分劳动力倾向于自动化。黛布拉和肯反复讨论政府在塑造这些技术如何影响社会方面所扮演的角色。在引导技术实现重要的社会目标方面,国家能发挥更大的作用吗?Well perhaps it’spossible, but is that really going to happen?

Ken asks Juliana whether people would struggle to find meaning in life without work. Juliana isn’t convinced that work would ever go away—jobs may be eliminated, but communities and societies will always need work to be done. The conversation turns toward how a universal basic income may provide a necessary social safety net, especially given how demeaning some jobs can be and how many jobs automation could eliminate. A listener calls in and asks about how little democracy and communal decision making goes into what work we want to be seen done. The conversation explores this rich intersection of questions.

  • Roving Philosophical Report (seek to 3:29):Liza Veale discusses cultural depictions of advanced artificial intelligence and robots doing all of our work. The moviesElysiumandThings To Comeserve as two examples.
  • PT Goes to the Movies: Ken and film blogger #FranciscOnFilm (aka Leslie Francis, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Utah) find unconventional heroism in some of the movies of summer 2017.

Transcript

Comments(6)


Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Friday, September 8, 2017 -- 11:47 AM

Work is something that keep

Work is something that keep us from doing something more interesting, or that prevents us from finding an activity having more purpose. There are a few lines of work-related endeavors which, by their nature, afford purpose as their primary reward. Most of us who have had to earn the money to give us a better-than-subsistence existence have been consumed by activity, the object of which was grounded in meaningless, capitalism (label that: for-profit). There appears to be a correlation between working and longevity. Even with the inner knowledge that their labors are essentially worthless, those who have been well-conditioned in the work-ethic tend to live longer. This must have some genetic and/or memetic basis. And so even if our walks of life are as divergent as our choices of leisure, the fact that many of us enthusiastically but into them transforms meaningless drivel into a raison d'etre.. If we believe we are important to those we love; to the nation in which we live; to a way of living; and to a shared consciousness, we are able to overlook the mundane aspects of wealth acquisition. I think automation, robotics and other influences will alter the paradigm. My notion is that rather than living longer lives in abundant leisure, we will die younger, be plagued boredom and a sense of unfulfilled lives. Hope I am wrong.

Lightsteal's picture

Lightsteal

Wednesday, September 13, 2017 -- 12:54 AM

Religious Connection to an End to Work

I first wanted to say that I recently discovered your show and have been listening to all of the old Podcasts. I really loved listening to John's grounded outlooks and how they balanced Ken's inquisitive force.

My comment/question for your guest is:

Jews have believed for thousands of years in the concept of the Shabbas which represents the infinite future time where humanity will have eliminated the need for work.
"Keeping" the Shabbas, for a Jew, is refraining from work in order to understand its purpose.

此外,亚当吃知识树果实的最初诅咒是劳动。

但就像犹太教中所有关于“未来世界”的概念一样,它们是无法企及的,只是随着时间的无限延伸,它们是可以接近的。

The amount of work required to sustain and advance humanity will go down, but never reach zero.

Does your guest think an end to work is attainable or just approachable?

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Monday, January 20, 2020 -- 11:24 AM

The brute force of

The brute force of sledgehammer scheduling may deliver deadline timeliness, but it is not, a fortiori, conducive to productive outcomes: promises are as ephemeral as the emptiness in which they are made.

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Wednesday, January 22, 2020 -- 11:25 AM

If there comes the time when

如果有一天,我们所知道的工作被废除了,我们将做些什么来赋予我们长寿和幸福生活所必需的决心和目标?关于这可能会是什么样子,已经有一些科幻小说的概念,但我看到的没有一个是合理的。必须有一些活动在智力和身体上都具有挑战性,否则厌倦很快就会取代新鲜;不活动,无论是在身体上还是在精神上都会导致衰老。我想,我们可以用最伟大的艺术和同样有远见的音乐来想象无聊。人类天生就有行动的需要——即使是逆境,在被克服时也能发挥出最佳状态。在我看来,一个没有工作的世界最容易等同于一个毫无价值的世界。我认为我们需要某种基因重组来为我们的损失和/或工作的需要做准备——这种重组必须是进化变化或某种人工智能增强的结果。更多的科幻小说吗?也许是这样,也许不是……

qhardy's picture

qhardy

Tuesday, February 11, 2020 -- 12:38 PM

In the intro, Debra Satz said

In the intro, Debra Satz said technology will wipe out "good middle class jobs like...cashiers." That sounded odd, so I checked.
Pew Research says middle class for a family of four is $46,960 to $140,900 per year ((https://money.cnn.com/infographic/economy/what-is-middle-class-anyway/in...)).
Indeed.com puts the national wage for a cashier at $10.75/hr, which works out to $21,500 a year. If both parents are cashiers, they still don't get to the lowest rung.
人们可以争论科技是否正在抹杀就业机会——在失业率达到创纪录水平之际,这是我们关注的一个有趣话题——但人们应该在辩论中运用正确的事实。

To the main point: The issue here doesn't seem to be work, but a sense of having purpose or meaning associated with this one life on Earth we know. To posit this can for most people only be fulfilled by work for pay is a sad thing, though perhaps evidence that in our time the Market has taken the place of religion as a central organizing principle.

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Saturday, March 7, 2020 -- 11:21 AM

Good research, Hardy. Nothing

Good research, Hardy. Nothing like keeping them honest. I would not have imagined that cashiering would have been considered middle-class either(unless, of course, we are including those in food and beverage who are making good tips. Sometimes they are borderline-middle-class; sometimes, not so much...)This is the interesting thing about information now. In an era of 'transparency' and scrutinous fact checking, it appears there are evermore people and groups who try to 'push the envelope' in one way or another. I suppose the fact that there are so many liars in important places, the compulsion to truth-say is losing impetus. Belief is not what it used to be, if, in fact, it ever was.