没有. This is stupid. Anyone knowing awesome from mediocre gets this.

Everytime someone tells me something is awesome, when it is little better than usual, reasonable
习惯上，我认为夸张是为了效果。我想掐住这些人的喉咙，要求他们知道他们对牛逼的定义是什么。例如，一次舒适而成功的排便并不可怕。大峡谷可能是。或者,borealus。当我们在一家受欢迎的餐厅点餐时，这可不是什么好事。如果服务和食物是特别的，我们可能会重新检查我们的评估。Awesome是一种过时的算法，留给我们的是一种虚无感。这是对政治正确的进一步无用应用。如果我打喷嚏，你会说:，太棒了? I truly hope not.

Riggle discusses this and more. You have more in common with his thesis than you think.

里格尔不傻。他拿自己的论点开玩笑，但他所讨论的术语中有一些新的东西，这是几乎所有美国人都同意的。难得有社交机会。我们不要用古怪来浪费它们。恐惧不再是令人敬畏的核心。奇迹延伸到社区，最近，它很难找到。

Awesome Prius
-Nobody

The same goes for bowel movements.

Well. You may have this any way you wish, Tim. Awesome is over-used. In 1986, i had a brief relationship with someone.. She was a mid-level administrative professional, paid in the 65 to 70 thousand dollar range. Her boom crutch was UM. She could not prepare well enough to avoid this piece of presentational sleight-of-vocalization. Anyone in the business of presentations understands that a pause is better than an um. Awesome is similar. Seems to me. Same with if you thank someone for something and they reply: no problem. If there were a problem; could be one, you have no business in any kind of. person-to-person public contact. You are welcome is respectful and involves only one more word. .I do not care for new-speak. This has nothing to do with constructive change. It is about respect, understanding and uncommon sense. Common sense is no longer an option, it seems.

难以置信的寒意。没有华丽的语言和修辞技巧。好了。华丽的足够了吗?“了不起”是另一种戏剧许可——让重要变得平凡的方式。有点像，1986年我和前任去的那个地方。这些话题在成为话题之前就已经令人厌倦了。在我看来，这些平凡的事情值得进行任何哲学讨论，这是有争议的。但是，做这些决定不在我的权限之内。关于取消文化，现在有各种各样的想法; history revisionism; and who knows what else that have peripheral relation to philosophy. Flavors of the week. These diversions have no place, seems to me. Their creation (or emergence) is distraction from more serious problems that current thinkers are loathe to tackle...

many of which are insoluable. And have been for centuries. So, rather than rendering philosophy irrelevant, new questions are posed; new problems, suggested, tongue-in-cheek, hopinig no one will notice. i noticed. Read some of what Burke has written about rhetoric. Maybe the light bulb will yet illuminate.

Um...OK. No problem. I guess I can't have it my way.

So it's not semantic bleaching. Your point is what then? That this post is not worth posting. Yet still, you post to it? I think the philosopher protests too much.

如果你愿意，我们可以用伯克。你在那里买不到东西。2022世界杯小组赛分组他首先是个政治家，其次是哲学家。他谈到了Riggle所触及的一些要点(社交联系，关系和语言)，但他采用了两种方法来让桌上的花被剪掉。如果那是你的桌子，那就切掉…开导我。但是说句话，伯克到处都是为了满足他的需要，不像里格尔精确地呼唤一种新的审美。

I will hear Riggle out first... then wack it down as needed. That is the ethic of philosophy, and also kind of awesome.

没有t sure we are on the same Burke. Kenneth is the one I referred to. An autodidact and college instructor who never obtained a college degree. Talented intellect, who played by his own rules and marched to his own drumbeat. He recognized the limitations of rhetoric, and was, thereby, the one to best write about it.

General remarks on the premise of this post. 1. I do not see awesome-ness as a matter for ethics at all.. Tried to get to that earlier with velvet boxing gloves, clearly lacking effect. 2. When I referred to the Red Sea incident, I could not qualify that. We were, I venture, not there.. 3. If, as I doubt, Jesus arose from his grave after three days, that would have been awesome, I guess. And just so. There are notions posited on this blog. Many of which I find dubious, if not preposterous. There are commenters with whom I disagree, ideas I find paradoxical---even though paradox is impossible, as a practical matter....something only explainable, within our limited understanding.

In any case, thanks for your indulgence. PT is still more fun than a headache. Or covid. But, you might consider breaking your repetitious mold..Moreover, thinking more deeply on whether there are ethics connected with things like awesomeness...There is no next big thing. Never was.
Good night and good luck.
Be Well.

最后，你对道德的看法，以及它们如何在算法、科学等常规事物中发挥作用，让我感到困惑。道德是滑。是真理。但是，工具和知识的进步似乎超越了伦理问题。我在这里说的不是憎恶。有明确的例子说明……现在的想法会否认。在戴维森看来，伦理、道德之类的东西都是命题。Subject to skepticism, according to Dewey's notion about the
信仰的阴暗本质。哲学的变化。但是，从根本上说，并不是这样。如果哲学被便利或下一个大事件所背叛，这也不会是最后一次。

The word describes the phenomenon of awe, as in "shock and awe". Could this be an attempt to portray military aggression as "awesome"?

Anyone's guess is as good as anyone else's. Depending on motive, we can bend meaning, any which way we wish. This is why I have been fascinated with Davidson's idea of propositional attitudes.
Desire, belief, expectation, and a dozen others are what they are at any given time, depending on contingency and a totality of circumstances. Dewey, notoriously, found beliefs shady. Ideologies twist meaning to their own ends. Religion ends up with Philosophy in University humanities departments.
Some say the humanities are thereby enriched. I am not so certain. Truth remains illusive.. for all of the foregoing reasons. And more,I expect. But, some might argue, this is all rhetoric. Sure. But, if we do not exhaust reasons, we cannot arrive at solutions either.

awesome和它的否定，“suckyness”，乍一看似乎是代表卓越和低标准的表达。然而，这似乎不是事实，因为后者可以指物体实际的或可能的完美或不完美，这些东西可以同样的方式独立于观察它们的人来判断。然而，Awesomeness似乎包括令人愉快的非凡性这一主观现象，因此它描述的是一件事，而不是一个人或事物。作为一种命题态度(阿拉·戴维森)，当某件事被称为“棒呆了”时，比如冰淇淋蛋筒的味道，一个追溯至味觉的真实谓词，其原因可以通过物理过程来描述，它被应用于主体的思想中，即在一个“精神事件”的背景中，应用于一个抽象的对象，即冰淇淋蛋筒的一般概念。它的甜美和半融性之所以令人敬畏，是因为它是卓越的，可能与我称之为“令人敬畏”的原因非常不同，例如，也许是因为我想给卖给我它的人留下深刻的印象。说它“很棒”必须包含在它真的很棒的情况下。因此，我同意对话者诺伊曼关于某物的令人敬畏的事件是很容易接近的通过把它考虑为一种命题态度，它可以是任何一种信仰，主张，恐惧，渴望，欲望，等等，关键的一点是其中之一是令人敬畏事件的真正原因，而不是感知什么的物理原因，与主体对它的命题态度有关，构成了一个抽象的物理对象，虽然是真实的，但不能有助于令人敬畏的说法的真相。

Jesus! Two interlocutors are greater than one. If I can find no second on the intertubes... I will resign myself to the proposition that Davidson is awesome.

Dewey have agreement? I am just trying to Riggle my way out of this.

这个节目到处都是。这个节目前发布的很多地方都做得很好，尤其是伊恩的部分。我确实读过这本书。就像我读完的大多数书一样，我发现自己对这本书总体上很感兴趣。并非所有的哲学都是深刻的。有些是出乎意料的。实际上，我认为这可能比作者想的要多得多。

我认为有时候忍受是很可怕的。也许这就是我在这里学到的。

All else aside, I just don't get an ethical connection with awesome-ness. Can't even suss why there ought to be one.

我想我在这个话题上已经很乏味了。也许只有可憎的吗?考虑到其他因素，我的生活经历，面对面的，令人敬畏的，并不可怕或可怕。恐惧和恐惧并没有与我对敬畏的概念联系在一起。我从来没有去过大峡谷。也没见过大堡礁。我看过北极光的颜色。发现那些既不可怕也不可怕。现在，我想，如果我亲眼目睹了所谓的红海分离，我一定会感到困惑不解。或者说是耶稣的复活。 Such events are enigmatic---if one was not there.
因此，它们是信仰的问题。或信念。在以前的例子中，我承认人们有充分的权利保持他们的信仰和信仰。如果这些命题的态度与我们珍视的事物相关联，顺其自然。根据最近的说法，“了不起”被高估了。每个人都有自己的专辑要做。I am just not that excited about it...

没有t necessarily germain here, but since the matter of linguistics could be involved, I wonder if PT might have a hearing on modern usages? When ordinary words are toyed with to suit new notions, the mix can be humorous. For example, reveal being used in lieu of the more traditional revelation.
Or, the also-recent use of pivot, to denote a change of course. There are other emergent examples which show the influence of mass/popular culture. Linguists think about these things...have probably written about them. If you have done a show about this, I am unaware of it.

Yesterday, my wife and I ate a, low-end brunch at a local nook. It was a quiet, pleasant experience. There was a small distraction. At the hosting desk, the greeting sign read: we are awesome. They were not. It is a quiet, pleasant, low-end place to eat. We will, for those reasons, likely eat there again.
Awesome is superfluous hyperbole. But, oh...hyperbole IS superfluous, isn't it?

Since the initiation of the notion of awesomeness, I have aggravated some people with my remarks, amused others: and perplexed a few more. Deciding that my views are distinctly contrary to a plurality of thinkers and participants, I bow out, gratefully---no, not gracefully---I meant what I wrote. My favored term of approval has been : outstanding! It is a traditional and conventional term and conveys approval in a non-trendy sort of frame. And the thing I like about it most is the ring of sincerity. People smile and their eyes light up when they hear it. Sincerity still has a lot going for it.
——在我看来。“糟糕”是不会出现的。