The Value of Anger

11 February 2022

Shouldn’t we get angry at injustice? Don’t some things deserve our rage? Or will rage just beget more rage? These are some of the questions we're thinking about on this week's show, "Righteous Rage."

如今,不公正无处不在——从独裁者压迫公民,到企业破坏环境,再到新纳粹主义者大肆宣扬种族主义——愤怒是很有道理的。

但从塞内加到桑提迪瓦到玛莎·努斯鲍姆等哲学家都认为,愤怒总是危险的、不必要的。当然,有些愤怒的表达是危险的:我们可能会同意,出于报复而伤害别人或在公共场合发脾气是错误的。

And some anger is uncalled for: there are people who get angry when they lose to their supposed social inferiors, or when someone tells them things they don’t want to hear. But why paint all anger with the same brush?

One argument against anger points to its consequences. The Stoic philosopherSenecawrote that “no plague has cost the human race more dear” and warns of “slaughterings and poisonings” to “torches applied to roofs” to “whole nations condemned to death in one common ruin.”

但这些后果都不是不可避免的:你不必每次生气都要杀人。你可以通过公开反对不公正来引导你的情绪来解决问题,或者通过加入一个积极的运动来创造积极的改变。

Some authors have argued that activists should not be angry, but should seek to replace anger with other emotions, like love. Martha Nussbaum claims that anger is counterproductive to activist goals: it can scare away allies, or anger the powerful.

But as Amia Srinivasanpoints out, anger is often “counterproductive—on those occasions when it is—because powerful people have made it so.” Why should the onus for change fall on angry activists, rather than on the world that allows no room to them?

And shouldn’t those of us who claim to be allies work on accepting the emotions of marginalized people, even when it feels difficult or awkward? Complaining that a criticism is too angry is often just a convenient way to dismiss it without listening.

Besides, there is no need to replace anger with love, since anger isn’t antithetical to love in the first place. It’s possible to be angry at someone you love—perhaps even because loving them has raised your moral expectations of them.

Anger can also be a way of expressing love for the victim of harm, whether that victim is another person or yourself. Objecting to unfair treatment is a way of expressing self-respect when you've repeatedly been told that you are unworthy because of your skin color, disability status, class, or race.

这并不是说愤怒总是好的。当愤怒导致暴力时,当愤怒基于一种不合理的权利意识时,或当愤怒针对那些没有做任何值得愤怒的事情的人时,我们应该反对。将好的例子和坏的例子分开需要一些工作。

I’m excited to talk to this week’s guest, Myisha Cherry from UC Riverside. She’s the author ofRighteous Rage: Why Anger is Essential to Anti-Racist Struggle, and I expect she’ll have a lot of insight about why certain kinds of anger are valuable.

Photo byClay BanksonUnsplash

Comments(3)


Tim Smith's picture

Tim Smith

Saturday, February 12, 2022 -- 9:54 AM

Anger is informative, rage is

Anger is informative, rage is dangerous, violence is hurtful, as is property damage. Encouraging oppressed groups to express rage as justifiable is unwise, and the argument is not made in this show or Cherry’s book. There are too many conditions for rage for any practical advice about when and where rage is appropriate.

用愤怒来表达你的观点是一个人应该做的。用不损害私人和公共财产的运动、非暴力抗议来表达愤怒——这是有效的。破坏总是比创造容易。我不是和平主义者,但在我国境内,非法的对外战争和数百年来的社会不公正现象一直存在;我承认我过去不知不觉地、心照不宣地、甚至公然地支持过。我现在已经过去了——尽管我将来可能会犯错误(解放克里米亚!!)

我不认为暴力镇压非暴力抗议者会产生任何有成效的结果;我从来没看到过激烈表达愤怒会有什么建设性的结果。我不喜欢。切里和雷似乎认为还有回旋的余地,但事实并非如此。

I've read and agree to abide by the Community Guidelines
Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Friday, March 11, 2022 -- 6:06 AM

我同意。There is a growing

我同意。在我所在的地区,枪支暴力事件越来越多。这是在杀害那些碍事的孩子。不幸的是,对枪支持有和隐蔽携带的支持依然猖獗。支持者没有意识到他们的事业是问题的一个重要部分。

I've read and agree to abide by the Community Guidelines
Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Wednesday, March 16, 2022 -- 5:20 PM

Does anger = talking so

Does anger = talking so loudly; speaking so rapidly, that no one fully knows what you are saying? Or, does the latter piece, after the = sign, simply show the anger people manifest, when having to interact with others at all? We are not all deaf. Not even those who went to too many metal rock concerts, long ago. So, my inference is the former notion is correct. And, in conjunction, loud mouths should step back---or not bother me at all. Not an unreasonable request, no.

I've read and agree to abide by the Community Guidelines