信仰应该以真理为目标吗?

13 May 2017

Should your beliefs aim at the truth? Or should you just believe whatever makes your life better, whether it’s true or not?

These are the questions we’re thinking about in this week’s show.

You might think that the answer is obviously that our beliefs shouldalwaysaim at the truth. But consider this—sometimes it’s actually to your advantage to have some false beliefs.

心理学家研究了一种叫做“积极幻觉”的现象,快乐的信念可以产生强大的影响,尽管它不是真的。例如,想象你正在参加一场比赛,你对自己的能力有一个错误的印象。你认为自己是跑得最快的,虽然这不是真的。研究表明,这种积极世界杯赛程2022赛程表欧洲区的幻觉实际上可以让你在比赛中做得更好,而如果你对自己的能力有一个更现实的评估,你就会做得更好。这里有一个例子,在给定一系列目标的情况下,错误的信念会比真实的信念带来更好的结果。

Does this example by itself prove anything one way or another about whether our beliefs ought to aim at the truth? No, because the reason why you perform better believing a positive illusion may have more to do with feeling confident and avoiding anxiety than holding a false belief. It’s not a stretch to see how feeling confident could have benefits for performance, even if the confidence is ultimately unwarranted. If you lack confidence, you might be anxious and distracted, and that could easily interfere with your performance. Whereas if you feel confident, you’ll be more focused and less likely to self-sabotage.

Let’s consider another example, then. Would you be happy believing that all your friends adore you? What if the reality was that most of your friends merely tolerated you, and only hung out with you from a mixture of pity, charity, and a misguided sense of loyalty? Would you really want to know that? Or would you rather keep believing the happy illusion?

On the one hand, acknowledging the truth in such a case could lead to depression. On the other hand, there's something about the truth that makes it intrinsicly appealing, even when utterly depressing.

Granted, we believe for all sorts of reasons. We believe to make our lives easier, to motivate our projects, to reinforce our values, to develop connections. Is believing the truth and nothing but the truth the best way to achieve all those goals?

Whatever the limited instrumental value of certain types of self-deception, we cannot deny the enormous value believing the truth brings. We need true beliefs to achieve our most basic goals in life. If there’s something I desire, I am better off knowing realistically how to satisfy my desires rather than having an unrealistic picture that only leads me astray.

If your beliefsdon'taim at the truth, then you're going to be frustrated a lot. Of course, there may be some lucky accidents—positive outcomes that result from false beliefs. But, in general, believing falsehoods isn’t a reliable way to get what you want in life. You need a realistic picture of what you need to do—what actions you need to take—to get what you want. Your beliefs need to track the truth. Otherwise it’s just a shot in the dark; andoccasionallyyou might get lucky.

That’s not to say that realism and truth are always a good thing. It would be hard to get out of bed in the morning sometimes if we only believed true things. It would be too depressing. Of course, we don’t have to dwell on all the unpleasant truths in life. There are plenty of happy truths to consider too.

Believing the truth, it seems, is a bit of a mixed bag. Sometimes there are benefits to believing falsehoods, which is not to say that we ought toaimfor false beliefs. That would just lead to frustrated desires. But too great a focus on some truths could lead to depression.

So, where does that leave us? What is the answer to the question with which we started—should our beliefs aim at the truth?

A better question might be whether our beliefscould everaim at anything else? Consider how ridiculous it would be to say, “I believe it, but it’s not true.” If you think something is not true, then it makes no sense to say that you believe it. You would be contradicting yourself. If you think it's not true, then you don't believe it.

真理是与信仰的本质紧密相连的——相信就是相信某件事是真的。

To a philosopher, that may seem like an obvious, inescapable truth about beliefs. Poets, on the other hand, have much greater tolerance for contradictory beliefs. Interestingly, our guest this week—Ray Briggs—is both a philosopher and a poet. It will be curious to hear what her position on these questions are.

与此同时,我将把威廉·莎士比亚的十四行诗138留给你,你可以自己决定我们的信仰是否应该总是——或者只是有时——以真理为目标。

When my love swears that she is made of truth,
I do believe her, though I know she lies,
That she might think me some untutor'd youth,
不擅长伪造世界上的赝品。
Thus vainly thinking that she thinks me young,
Although I know my years be past the best,
I smiling credit her false-speaking tongue,
面对爱情中的缺点,用爱的病休。
可是为什么我的爱人说她年轻呢?
And wherefore say not I that I am old?
O love's best habit is a flattering tongue,
而年龄,在爱情里,不喜欢把年龄说出来。
Therefore I'll lie with love, and love with me,
Since that our faults in love thus smother'd be.

Comments(7)


Ashley's picture

Ashley

Sunday, May 14, 2017 -- 10:50 AM

Do we want the president to

Do we want the president to aim their beliefs at the truth? The current and former president's are examples of both extremes.

RepoMan05's picture

RepoMan05

Saturday, November 9, 2019 -- 4:36 PM

In short, don't parrot

In short, don't parrot leftist dixiecrats who're struggling to control your free speach and how you're allowed to use the internet. They use faux-altruism and lies.

为什么还要看民主党的辩论?为什么不直接读他们的剧本,节省自己的时间呢?(dem playbook = list of common fallacies)

RepoMan05's picture

RepoMan05

Saturday, November 9, 2019 -- 6:13 PM

The only thing you can

The only thing you can actually have is a false belief. Since there is a clear separation between us and reality(truth exists independently of us and our belief of it) any belief can never perfectly fit reality. As soon as you believed something, you believed a lie. You can't change reality with your mind.

试试这个的大小。把天空变成粉红色。如果你尝试一下瑜伽,你其实可以做到。对瑜伽爱好者来说可能需要十分钟。仰面躺着,抬头看看天空。在你的头脑中娱乐,你可以控制你自己的小世界。专注于看天空最近的粉色阴影(粉色的紫色光谱)。过一会儿就会变成粉红色。

I actually got stuck like that for ~ten seconds once. Everything was pink.

Disclaimer. It's much less a yoga feat as much as biochemistry. Your retina gets desensitized to blue and instead sends signals as pink as it is the reverse of blue.

Proof by reversal of terms - If you sit in the sun with your eyes closed for 10 minutes, everything will be blue-ish when you open them.

It's just your retina getting tired.

The point is, no matter how convincing your belief, it's an independent psychosis. You use it as a model of actual reality. You use it for navigational purposes. It's both incorporeal and incomplete.

One thing that's verifiably immoral: forcing others to navigate by your own model, be it a collectivist model or otherwise.

RepoMan05's picture

RepoMan05

Saturday, November 9, 2019 -- 8:22 PM

Q) should beliefs aim at

Q) should beliefs aim at truth when there's no chance of it?

A) Sure, why not.

psychosis is often therapeutic and it's your only choice anyway.

Should people point their completely subjective beliefs at others tho? Only if they want to be objectively shot for their tyranny.

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Tuesday, November 12, 2019 -- 12:11 PM

I have commented on this

我以前曾评论过这个概念。你所说的任何让我们感觉良好的东西都是值得坚持的信念,这与我的思维方式最为相关,也就是说:信念与真理的区别就像黑夜与白昼的区别一样。有些东西,基于信仰,可能是(也可能不是)真的,然而,真理是独立存在的。例如:大多数生物需要氧气和水这一事实本身就是事实,不需要任何形式的信仰来证明这是事实。杜威说,信念是靠不住的。他从来没有说过,白天和黑夜是不同的这一事实受到了这种差异的影响——至少在我对他作品的记忆中没有。当然,我并没有全部读完……我不知道从“积极的幻觉”中获得了什么,如果它最终仍然是幻觉?

Tim Smith's picture

Tim Smith

Wednesday, November 13, 2019 -- 9:12 PM

A belief is an internal state

A belief is an internal state that motivates an action in conjunction with a desire that will satisfy the desire if the belief is true.

Philosophy is non partisan. It is the discussion of the common grounds of grounds themselves.
But... since this discussion went partisan... let's use it.

Use case one - President Obama believed he could save lives by drawing a line at the use of chemical weapons in Syria.
If only he had stuck to this belief it would have indeed saved many lives and costly migrations. Retrospect is brutal.

案例二——特朗普总统认为,他可以凌驾于法律之上,从而执行法律,并以此打破法律。
The silver cord is snapped, not to mention the golden rule.
逻辑更加残酷。

So what does this have to do with Laura's post? Should we aim at truth in our beliefs.

Use case one: Obama had a belief but let fear, another internal state that motivates action, get the best of him. Barack should have aimed at truth.

用例二:有些人喜欢说特朗普只相信自己。事实是……他不知道自己想要什么,至少不知道一直想要什么。没有持续的欲望,信仰就不会有满足。唐纳德的另一个事实其实是转瞬即逝的欲望。

所以……信仰应该以真理为目标吗?是的。只要有一致的愿望。当行动影响外部状态时,这些欲望应该是所有人的,或者至少是很多人的。

Is there such thing as truth. Retrospectively there is. Presently and prospectively there is certainly logical truth. Let’s not deny truth when for the most part the problem is a lack of desire to do anything about it.

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Thursday, November 14, 2019 -- 11:25 AM

Eloquently put, Mr. Smith.

Eloquently put, Mr. Smith. Thank you.