笛卡尔是他那个时代的人。生命的巨大链条在很大程度上仍然是思想的秩序，现象世界几乎还没有进入人们的视野。这个问题是在它自己的时间里提出的。听起来“人”是企业审查的问题，就像商业提案或“招股说明书”一样!我们如何表现自己并不代表我们是谁，除非你指的是我忽略的细节。我们一遍又一遍地犯同样的错误，把本体论当成量词。没有“是”任何东西的枚举器。形而上学的是枚举者，现象的是枚举者。但两者本身都不完全，彼此也不完全。量化的逻辑一直争论不休，直到它作为最严格的术语失去了枚举器。 That loss is not this one or that one, not a determination which one is which or an aggregation of unifying attributes (the monad). It is the act of that extremity of reason where the enumerator is lost to it. That act is what person is. The most extensive term of time is that rigor entailing that loss, but the act of that loss itself is the characterology (the dynamic of an unstable conviction) of that entailment. That is, the conceit of the logical comprehension of the quantifier, of inference by extension of antecedence, and therefore that time is completed only by extension, is most extensive entailing that most rigorous term the lost enumerator is. But the act itself, and what person is, is the moment of that loss. Moment that differs all extension, and is there the most comprehensive term. Person is not a corporate property, nor a private 'presentation'. Actually, as act, it is more like absence, absence that remains only as responsibility of the worth of its loss being recognized. A conviction of person as presence or presentation commits us to irresponsibility.

如何找到自我?这就是问题所在。如果我可以建议:去一趟乌尔姆，爬进一个炉子里，把自己变成我，呆在那里，直到你完全掌握了一切。如果乌尔姆是不可能的，那就顺流而下，走向自然，走向你自己，因为一切的真理，包括“我”或“自己”，你自己也可以在那里找到。如果那时附近没有河，那就试着放弃你所拥有的一切和你所知道的，坐在树下，等我来找你。如果没有树可以坐在下面，那么就跟随光，在问题或怀疑的灰色地带之外是绝对的，一个人真正自我的应许之地。如果你看不见那道光，那就跟着自己的心走，心是真实的。是真实的。我建议科学，但光速可能会阻碍你。还有上帝，嗯，一个人也能在那里找到我，除非你迷失其中。 Try mathematics, I can be found in an equation. As for Justice, I am at the center of her scale. And if all else fails then ask yourself what is the measure of you? The answer is truly immeasurable. I can be found in all of the above, in everything, in you. =

Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfern Schplenden Schlitter Crass Cren Bon Fried Digger Dingle Dangle Dongle Dungle Burstein von Knacker Trasher Apple Banger Horowitz Ticolensic Grander Knotty Spelltinkle Grandlich Grumblemeyer Spelter Wasser Kürstlich Himble Eisenbahnwagen Gutenabend Bitte einen Nürnburger Bratwürstel Gespurten mit Zweimache Luber Hundsfut Gumberaber Schönendanker Ulm的Kalbsfleisch Mittelraucher von Hauptkopft ?

乌尔姆的人民是数学家。=

All of them? Always? If so, they competently use the sign '=' with the full implication of the unequal.

I'll opine that variability and multiplicity are just the ticket. Our interpersonal relationships are in frequent fluctuation because of the various and multiplicious scenarios we participate in almost daily. We present facades for each situation, responsibility and audience we encounter. It is this adaptability that best ensures our successes (or failures) as human beings because we can be, yea, must be different things to different people. But, well, Ken Taylor is Ken Taylor. He is interested in what makes us tick. And he has already suggested in this post the essence of what is being opined in these brief comments. We all have social identities we amend as our situational roles change. And each of us has a personal identity, known mostly to ourselves and to the occasional individual whom we trust. And to whom we are not beholden for a paycheck or some other creature comfort that we do not wish to live without. We are chameleons--and good at it. Well, during moments of success anyway.
Neuman

?Some people do what they love. Some do it by default. Some do it by
knowing. Some people do what they don?t love. Some do it by default.
有些人是通过认知来做到的。What if you had the ability to know and do
what you love??
正如苏格拉底所说的“认识你自己”。
Stanley Tsiamoulis' words of wisdom.

It was Delphi, not Socrates. The oracle was warning us that interpretation can go disastrously wrong if the inquirer doesn't know who he is and what and why he is really seeking the word of the oracle. Socrates was told there that no one was wiser, but he spent his life proving that this only meant he knew nothing and knew that he knew nothing. Plato spent his career proving that this is more meaningful than all the pretenses to knowing ourselves and the world that we get up to, with more or less conviction.

A great part of the examination on the self,has concentrated on the significance of self-regard. In spite of the fact that this property of the self is of awesome centrality in comprehension the self, it might be addressed in the event that it is the most critical. This article will talk about the significance of self-presentation as one of the numerous properties of self.website

From being in your post, the most spirited act is still to think for you. Clothes mean nothing until someone lives in them. We must never confound classiness with condescension. Chris Jericho y2j light Leather Jacket