The Science of Happiness

17 March 2016

Psychology used to be mostly concerned withunhappiness, treating the wounded, the traumatized, or the pathological. But now there is an emerging science called positive psychology that focuses on how ordinary people can cultivate positive life qualities and be happy. Of course, to study happiness scientifically, we need to know exactly what happiness is and how we can measure it.

I’m reminded here of St. Augustine’s famous insight about time. He knows what it is when no one asks him, but as soon as he has to explain it to another, he does not know. Similarly for happiness—we know whether or not we’re happy, even if we don't know exactly how to define it.

所以,如果我问你是否快乐以及为什么快乐,你的回答可能会提到很多因素,比如你对你的事业或人际关系的满意程度,你是否经常有愉快的经历,以及你的总体情绪或人生观——你倾向于快乐还是暴躁,悲观还是乐观。是这些因素中的一种或另一种决定了幸福,还是生活满意度、愉快的经历、情绪和前景的某种组合?

Let’s consider each factor one by one. Consider life satisfaction. Could you imagine a person who is satisfied with life but still unhappy? Think of someone who has focused too much on advancing their career and making money. Perhaps one day this person will realize that, while they’ve been busy accomplishing their goals, they never stopped to smell the roses or nurture relationships, and now their success feels hollow. So, they’re satisfied but not happy. Of course, you might reject the premise that this person is truly satisfied with life. Maybe they once thought they were, but then their values changed and that feeling of satisfaction evaporated.

Consider, then, enjoying many pleasures in life. Is this sufficient for happiness? It may be sufficient (though I doubt it), but it’s certainly notnecessary. Imagine a person who suffers many hardships and few pleasures in life, but they maintain a positive outlook throughout it all and are always cheerful. It would be hard to deny this person was happy, despite the harsh conditions of their life.

所以,这就给我们留下了情绪和前景——快乐vs暴躁。然而,快乐并不仅仅是心情好。情绪变化无常,转瞬即逝,而幸福则更持久稳定。当然,幸福也会改变。我相信你的生活中也有快乐的时候也有不快乐的时候。Maybe happiness, then, is more of a dispositional state—like having atendencyto be in a good mood more of the time, or atendencyto have a positive outlook.

Ifthat’swhat happiness is, then it’s overrated. The always cheerful or overly positive can be annoying, and they often have a tenuous grip on reality, if you ask me. I’d rather know the unhappy truth than be blissfully ignorant; most of the time, anyway.

There is a different notion of happiness that I haven’t mentioned so far, and that’s what Aristotle calledeudaimonia, meaning flourishing or well-being. Aristotle believed that human flourishing was tied to practicing "the virtues” in our everyday lives. And he might have been on to something because research in positive psychology suggests that much of our happiness depends on our daily habits and activities. People are happier when they cultivate meaningful connections with others and gratitude within themselves.

To learn more about the science of happiness, tune into this week’s show with guest Emiliana Simon-Thomas, Science Director at the Greater Good Science Center, UC Berkeley.


Photo byTimothy EberlyonUnsplash

Comments(6)


Gary M Washburn's picture

Gary M Washburn

Friday, March 18, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

Perhaps we're a bit unhappy

Perhaps we're a bit unhappy at present. Alice was happy when she learned there would be pudding every other day, but unhappy when it was explained to her that today is never any other day. You might as well ask if we are going, gone, or still here. Where is there if we are always here? Luther took cheerfulness as a sign of grace, and devised a system in which the world was divided between enthusiasm and dissatisfaction, between godly mania and devilish depression, and, implicitly, between the saintly rich and profane poor. Science has no bearing until the grammar of dynamic difference is better understood. You can't bring humanity under instrumental reason by measuring hormones in the brain because we cannot understand what change really is in those terms.

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Monday, March 21, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

Happiness is "different

幸福是“因人而异”的。我发现在我的大多数旅行、人际关系、友谊和交往中都是如此。我不知道有一门关于幸福的科学正在萌芽,但是,我想它迟早会兴起,因为人们正在意识到他们所追求的东西,是的,人们也一样,并没有给他们带来他们所期望的那种幸福的感觉。幸福不是一个明显的非此即彼的命题。就我而言,当我的钱更少、财产更少的时候,我对我的生活更快乐,但却把每一天视为一系列新的冒险。我过去不是,现在也不是,永远快乐,永远绝望的乐观主义者。有些人、地方和环境会让我变得喜怒无常。那些有相同反应却努力掩盖和忽视它们的人往往会患上严重的身体和/或精神疾病。我们当中那些有某种不可动摇的信念的人可能总体上更健康,但这并不能保证我们对群体有好处。或者我们自然而然地就在幸福的人群中。
I have long read several noted thinkers of our time, including the Horsemen (Dawkins; Dennett; and Harris---RIP Chris Hitchens). Dawkins latest memoirs are a pleasure: An Appetite for Wonder and Brief Candle in the Dark. He writes with the easy comfort of someone who knows who he is and is grateful, even happy, with how and when he got there. May we presume that Richard Dawkins is a happy human being? I could opine as much, but those who care to reach their own conclusion(s) would need to investigate for themselves. Success would seem to be a factor here-and some kind of unshakable belief. Perhaps even before those, however, there needs to be PURPOSE. I wonder if Mr. Dawkins knows about a science of happiness? I don't know him, but I'd almost bet on it. He certainly seems to have had some fun in his seventy-plus years. And that is very likely a part of the happiness equation as well.
Neuman.

Gary M Washburn's picture

Gary M Washburn

Tuesday, March 22, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

The god delusion is not

The god delusion is not supplanted effectively by rational purpose because time thwarts both. And though time often brings unhappiness, it also even more often so dispels the myth of transcendence in serendipity that we can hardly fail to recognize an abundance in it that no god or rational purpose could ever pretend to ordain or anticipate. Time is what abundance is. There is no other happiness so real as recognition of that abundance.

Guest's picture

Guest

Sunday, May 22, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

I have been following your

我已经关注你的博客有一段时间了,发现它信息量很大,也很有趣,你表达文章的方式很好。作者用良好的语言和信息清晰地描述了文章的各个部分。期待下一篇文章。

Guest's picture

Guest

Friday, July 8, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

Happiness are of different

Happiness are of different types and we should learn how to stay happy, live happy and make other happy. Therefore we should learn some basic facts and psychological facts about happiness and this above article is the best ever choice to learn facts about happiness. Moreover people are unable to share their happiness now days, as a result they are feeling conservative and unexpressed; we should share our happiness to make it double and while following the above article we are able to learn facts and science and happiness.

Hannahbear27's picture

Hannahbear27

Saturday, September 17, 2016 -- 5:00 PM

Happiness is subjective. Humans will never be happy as long as we exist, we'll only be content. We are, and will always be in the search for more, no matter how "un-materialistic" we think of ourselves to be. We are in the age of technology and knowledge,and those two combined create an explosive pair. The amount of technology and knowledge we have at our fingertips is mind blowing, and its acting as catalyst for change in our brains. That change is consistently telling us we want more. The more we desire, the less "happy" we are. It's like humans are biologically programmed to just be content.