像无限和合一这样的概念在我们准确描述它们的能力方面是有问题的。虽然可以认为感知和语言总是不准确的现实表征，但我们根据比较和我们的知识概念来判断表征的适应性、准确性和一致性。

For example, in mathematics we have a concept of unity that we call "one". The mathematical "one" can be identified as single object and is considered equal to or identical to the collection of components that together form the object. We consider this model to be an accurate representations since it has consistency logically and physically. When we compare principles to the physical objects or the theoretical ones there is a high degree of consistency for the representation.

The concept of oneness in mathematics where a theoretical "one" (object or quantity) is equal to the sum of its parts is based on an object model. In this model the unity/object and the parts are essentially defined in terms of each other. This is the situation where 6 describes the unity in one way and a half-dozen describes the same entity it in another.

不管使用哪个引用，一个或多个对象(取决于您如何引用它/它们)都不会改变。在两个引用之间发生变化的是您在多重模型中划线的位置。在客体世界中，将识别视为单个实体(如人)或6个部分(如手臂、腿、躯干和头部)是一种分组问题。

Mathematics and logic only apply in a reality that contains multiple objects. A is not equal to A in the absence of multiplicity nor does 1 plus 1 equal 2. The concept of number, the rules of logic and the language of things are not applicable for a non-object state.

Non-objectdoesnotmeannon-being. In this instance, non-object is meant to identify the condition as lacking division or multiplicity.

我认为“存在”是显而易见的，超出了有意义的辩论。我还想说，我们拥有并使用的多样性模型与我们的经验相一致，并具有实际应用价值。然而，我们的经验、逻辑和数学驱使我们得出这样的结论:“合一”和因此神秘是人类条件的必要。

The short version of my argument is as follows:

(1) there is being
(2) there isonly being(no non-being)
(3) if there is only being there is oneness
(4) if there is oneness there is mystery because human knowledge requires multiplicity

Human knowledge requires multiplicity because all definitions of knowledge include a perceiver and something that they understand or are aware of. Knowledge cannot occur in the absence multiplicity and the perception relationship.

This is In addition to the previous claim that logic does not apply in the absence of pluralism. The "one" that we discuss in mathematics is relational unity in a universe of multiplicities of relational unities. It is not "oneness" in the sense of "being" without "division".

不可分割的存在/存在不能被对象语言充分描述。This is similar to the issue of reflection mentioned in the cave analogy ofPlato’s republicbut the gaps in the accuracy of the representations are more severe.

For this example, the analogies from the creation story inthe King James Version of the Biblemight be more appropriate. The following passages have been taken from the book of Genesis:

"And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil."Genesis 2:9

"And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:"Genesis 3:22

第一段是关于物质本性的参照知识的实现。This is the understanding of objects, division
and opposition. These are limited entities where the rules of number, math and logic apply.

第二段介绍了永恒、无限和不可分割的概念(合一)。

The infinite is beyond knowledge.