Against Marriage

15 May 2018

On the one hand, it might seem baffling that the state gets involved in our love life. Why does the government need to keep track of who's married to whom? Will they next start tracking who our friends are?

On the other, married partners gain certain important legal benefits regarding taxation, inheritance, next-of-kinship, and parental responsibility.

But is there a way for the state to keep track of these legal benefits without regulating our relationships?

This insightful and well-doneAeonarticle这么认为。克莱尔·钱伯斯博士认为,一个更加公正的社会不会让国家介入我们的恋爱关系。

Check it out:https://aeon.co/essays/why-marriage-is-both-anachronistic-and-discriminatory

Comments(7)


Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Thursday, May 17, 2018 -- 12:24 PM

This is a test, to see if

This is a test, to see if your anti-robo program is working properly.

Laura Maguire's picture

Laura Maguire

Thursday, May 17, 2018 -- 12:32 PM

Are you saying you're a robot

Are you saying you're a robot?

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Thursday, May 17, 2018 -- 12:58 PM

It seems that John Searle

It seems that John Searle (formerly of UC Berkeley) touched this issue in several of his works on consciousness; language; mind and social reality. Specifically, he addressed what he calls institutional facts and constitutive rules, among other notions which comprise his philosophy of mind and language. Marriage, in his view, is an institution (or institutional fact), which is governed and described by constitutive rules. (This account is bare-bones, because Searle has much more to say about the construction of society; linguistics and a host of related topics.) In any case, marriage arose out of the need for conformity and uniformity. Governments wanted to exert regulatory domain over their subjects, for a number of social, economic and cultural reasons. Marriage, having withstood the ravages of time and social unrest, is viewed with some sense of reverence by government and indeed by its precursor, faith (or theology; or religion; or whatever other descriptor, one might wish to elect, uh, select...).

并不是所有想要同居的人都选择结婚。然而,这并不是严格意义上的重点。越来越多的人在约束比过去少的地方结婚(或希望这样做)。婚姻作为一种制度性的事实,具有其自身的一套构成规则,赋予了未婚同居者所没有的某些权利、责任、特权等。这正是政府和宗教领袖所希望的。同性伴侣之间的婚姻,尽管在私下或公开场合都不被认可。因此比未婚关系更可取。这也是那些执政者或部长所希望的。

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Thursday, May 17, 2018 -- 1:03 PM

No. I was just asking why

No. I was just asking why there seems to be some difficulty in submitting comments. The previous one made above appears to have answered my question. Thank you, Laura.

Laura Maguire's picture

Laura Maguire

Thursday, May 17, 2018 -- 1:13 PM

困难是什么?And

困难是什么?这是刚刚开始发生的事情吗?(我们已经在网站上进行了更新,所以听到用户有特殊问题是件好事....)

Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Saturday, May 19, 2018 -- 1:03 PM

To your questions (May 17,

To your questions (May 17, 2018, 1:13 PM): The problem was CAPTCHA. About four days ago, I was trying to comment on another post, prior to leaving remarks on this one. After forming my comment, I tried to do the CAPTCHA puzzle(s). After going through a dozen or so puzzles (cars, street signs, store fronts, etc.) I simply gave up and returned to the home page. Before then, I had never been subjected that much CAPTCHA interrogation. I have no idea what, if anything, I was doing wrong.

Laura Maguire's picture

Laura Maguire

Wednesday, May 23, 2018 -- 11:27 AM

Thanks for the feedback.

Thanks for the feedback. There was some maintenance on the site, so that probably explains the difficulty you had. Hopefully it won't happen again.